All nasal bone fractures have the potential for worsening of olfactory function. However, few studies have studied the olfactory outcomes following reduction of nasal bone fractures. This study evaluates posttraumatic olfactory dysfunction in patients with nasal bone fracture before and after closed reduction.
A prospective study was conducted for all patients presenting with nasal bone fracture (n=97). Each patient consenting to the study underwent the Korean version of Sniffin' Sticks test (KVSS II) before operation and at 6 month after closed reduction. The nasal fractures were divided according to the nasal bone fracture classification by Haug and Prather (Types I–IV). The olfactory scores were compared across fracture types and between preoperative and postoperative settings.
Olfactory dysfunction was frequent after nasal fracture (45/97, 46.4%). Our olfactory assessment using the KVSS II test revealed that fracture reduction was not associated with improvements in the mean test score in Type I or Type II fractures. More specifically, the mean posttraumatic Threshold, discrimination and identification score decreased from 28.8 points prior to operation to 23.1 point at 6 months for Type II fracture with septal fracture.
Our study has revealed two alarming trends regarding post-nasal fracture olfactory dysfunction. First, our study demonstrated that almost half (46.4%) of nasal fracture patients experience posttraumatic olfactory dysfunction. Second, closed reduction of these fractures does not lead to improvements olfaction at 6 months, which suggest that olfactory dysfunction is probably due to factors other than the fracture itself. The association should be further explored between injuries that lead to nasal fracture and the mechanism behind posttraumatic olfactory dysfunction.
The nasal bone is the most common site of facial fracture and is the third most common fracture site for the whole body. Nasal bone fractures occur either alone or with other facial bone fractures and account for approximately 40 percent of all facial fractures [
A single-institution prospective cohort study was performed for all patients presenting with facial injury between March 2013 and May 2014. For each patient, potential fracture of the nasal bone was evaluated by physical examination and computed tomography (CT) imaging. Patients were enrolled into the study for the presence of nasal bone fracture (with or without septal fracture). Exclusion criteria were made for tobacco use, history of chronic infectious sinusitis, or allergic rhinitis. A total 97 patients met the study criteria during the study period. With enrollment, each patient underwent an olfactory function test before and after the respective operation. A database was created for patient demographics, fracture etiology, concomitant injury, clinical finding, and radiographic evaluation. The CT imaging was used to classify each fracture as one of four nasal fracture types according to the Haug and Prather classification [
The olfactory function was assessed in a quiet, well-ventilated room, within the two weeks leading up to the fracture reduction and again at six months after operation. At each evaluation, the patient was examined using the Korean Version of the Sniffin' Sticks Test (KVSS) II, which evaluates for 16 odors familiar to the Korean population [
The preoperative and postoperative TDI scores were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. For all calculations, a two-tailed
The age of patients enrolled in the study ranged from 14 to 67 years, with a mean of 36.5 years. The nasal bone fractures were caused by motor vehicle accidents, incidental falls, physical altercation, sports-related injury, and occupational hazard. Per the Haug and Prather classification, the most common type of fracture was the Type I fracture (58/97, 59.7%) with septal fractures present in 28 cases (48.2%). Type II fractures consisted of 19 cases (19.6%) with approximately half of the patients having septal fracture (10/19, 52.6%). The remaining 20 cases were evenly divided between Type III and Type IV fractures (10 patients each at 10.3%). Of the 97 patients, septal fractures were present in 51 patients (51/97, 52.6%) with the remaining 46 patients having purely bony fractures (46/97, 47.4%) (
Olfactory dysfunction was frequent among the nasal fracture patients. Of the total, olfaction was within normal range of TDI scores for 52 patients (53.6%), whereas 44 patients (45.2%) demonstrated hyposmia. A single patient demonstrated clinical anosmia with TDI of less than 12. This particular patient had suffered a complete separate of the nasal bone with septal fracture (
Our study evaluated TDI scores before and after nasal bone reduction for Type I and II fractures. Among patients with Type I fracture (n=58), the mean TDI score was 31.3 and 29.9 for preoperative and 6-month KVSS II tests, respectively (
Among patients with Type II fractures (n=19), the mean TDI scores were 29.9 and 26.0 at preoperative and 6 month evaluations, respectively (
In Type III and IV fracture groups, the TDI scores did not significantly differ between preoperative and postoperative olfactory function test (
The nose is frequently injured in facial trauma due to the protruding shape and the central location. It is composed of cartilaginous framework anteriorly and inferiorly, and is supported by facial bones posteriorly and superiorly. Despite the abundance of mechanically pliable cartilage, the nasal bones usually are fractured due to facial trauma [
Olfactory dysfunction can result from injury to any portion of the olfactory tract, and occurs most frequently with nasal bone fractures. In most situations, posttraumatic olfactory dysfunction is a consequence of the distortion of sinus tract. Nasal bone or midface fractures can disrupt the normal airflow and prevent odorants from reaching the olfactory nerve, resulting in conductive loss of smell [
Previous studies have focused primarily on olfactory dysfunction associated with complex head trauma [
Among the 97 patients in our study, posttraumatic olfactory dysfunction was observed in 45 patients (46.4%). Hyposmia was extremely common in our patient population. The observed ratio between normosmia and hyposmia increased with the severity of fracture according to the Haug and Prather classification. Though this association between fracture type and frequency of fracture was not statistically significant, we interpret this to be a reflection of the sample sizes being smaller for more severe fractures.
In previous studies, spontaneous recovery of olfaction has been recorded in patients with facial bone fractures. Among patients with posttraumatic anosmia, studies have found that one-third of patients eventually recover a degree of olfactory function [
In theory, posttraumatic olfactory dysfunction due to loss of air conduction should resolve with fracture reduction and cessation of mucosal edema. However, our olfactory assessment using the Korean version of Sniffin' Sticks test revealed that fracture reduction was not associated with improvements in the mean TDI score in Type I or Type II fractures. In fact, we were surprised to observe the trend for a decrease in the objective scores at 6 months after the operation. Though not all of the results were statistically significant, we again believe this to be a problem of the sample size. In the subset of Type II fractures with concomitant septal fracture, the mean posttraumatic TDI score decreased from 28.8 points prior to operation to 23.1 point at 6 months, which represents a transition from normosmia (greater than or equal to 28 points) into hyposmia (above 20 and below 28 points). These findings suggest that the nasal fracture itself is most likely not the sole cause of olfactory dysfunction. The continual worsening of olfactory sensitive and specificity may be due to damage to the olfactory nerve ending via surgical instrumentation of the nasal mucosa, nasal packing damage, persistent mucosal edema from chronic local infection, or postoperative viral infection such as herpes, influenza, and hepatitis viruses [
Our study has several limitations. First, our sample sizes were too small for subgroup analysis for more severe fractures (Types III and IV), though our data suggests that olfactory dysfunctions are probably more common and/or worse in more severe fractures. Second, we cannot say with definite certainty that patients who were found to have hyposmia were normosmic prior to injury because there is no retrospectively way to evaluate olfaction in an objective way. However, we find this to be a relatively safe assumption. Third, we did not assess olfactory function beyond the 6 month period, which could potentially reveal improvement over the 2 year period following trauma.
In conclusion, our study has revealed two alarming trends regarding post-nasal fracture olfactory dysfunction. First, our study demonstrated that almost half (46.4%) of nasal fracture patients experience posttraumatic olfactory dysfunction. Second, closed reduction of these fractures does not lead to improvements olfaction at 6 months, which suggest that olfactory dysfunction is probably due to factors other than the fracture itself (i.e., soft tissue injury). Olfactory dysfunction can significantly impair activities of daily living and decrease the quality of life in patients after nasal fracture. As such, the association should be further explored between injuries that lead to nasal fracture and the mechanism behind posttraumatic olfactory dysfunction.
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
The authors thank Dr. Aram Harijan for his insightful comments and assistance in the language of this manuscript.
a)The fracture type followed the Haug and Prather classification: Type I fracture is the fracture of inferior one half of nasal bone. Type II fracture is the fracture of entire nasal bone separated at nasofrontal surface. Type III fracture is the fractures of nasal bones and frontal process of maxilla. Type IV fracture is the fractures of complex facial bones including nasal bones, frontal process of maxilla, nasal spine of frontal bone and ethmoid bone.
a) The fracture type followed the Haug and Prather classification.