Lower eyelid incisions commonly used for accessing blowout fractures or lower blepharoplasty include the subciliary and transconjunctival approaches. The subciliary incision for orbital trauma is traditionally described as an incision approximately 2 mm below the lash line. This approach has been associated with anterior lamella scarring in some cases, thus making lower eyelid malposition with scleral show and a risk of ectropion. As an alternative to the subciliary approach, a transconjunctival approach to the lower eyelid was introduced for its advantages, such as a lower risk of eyelid malposition and minimal scarring. Now, it has become one of the main techniques for the management of orbital trauma and aesthetic surgery of lower eyelids.

Numerous studies have been performed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of transconjunctival approach in lower eyelid surgery. The vast majority of those studies, however, are retrospective and noncomparative in nature, making the deduction of valuable conclusions difficult. We measured the positional changes of the lower eyelid at time intervals after surgery since entropion is one of the most serious complications in transconjunctival approach. In this study, we performed a retrospective study to quantify positional changes in the lower eyelid and to identify the reliability of the transconjunctival approach.

The 42 patients included 25 men and 17 women. The average patient age was 41.3 years (range, 21–72 years) and the duration from the day of trauma to the operation day was 6.07±1.16 days. There were 10 cases of medial wall fractures, 13 cases of inferior wall fractures, and the rest were combined fractures. A lateral canthotomy or cantholysis for more exposure was not done. We could not find any clinical complications such as infection, hematoma and bleeding during the follow-up period.

The mean M₀ was 4.200±0.601 mm; mean M₁, 4.168±0.608 mm; mean M₂, 4.248±0.595 mm; and mean M₃, 4.248±0.587 mm. The difference between M₀ and M₁ was −0.336±1.191 (p=0.052), between M₀ and M₂ was 0.504±1.002 (p=0.001), and between M₀ and M₃ was 0.504±1.243 (p=0.06) (Table 1). There was a significant difference between M₀ and M₂, but there was no statistically significant difference between the other intervals.

The mean ratio of the change in postoperative eyelash angle was 0.997 (1 week), 1.001 (1 month), and 1.000 (3 months), postoperatively (Table 2). At 1 week post-surgery, the lower eyelid was slightly everted but had returned to its normal position at 1 month post-surgery. There was no statistical significance in the change of the postoperative eyelash angle (p=0.58).

We measured the positional changes in the lower eyelids in blowout fracture repair using transconjunctival incision. The lower eyelid was slightly displaced at 1 week post-surgery due to periorbital swelling, but later returned to the original position. In this result, we found the statistical significance in the difference between M₀ and M₂, but there was no meaningful finding in the other intervals. In other words, minimal displacement in the lower eyelid at 1 month post-surgery was seen as an ectropion about 0.5 mm, but it improved and returned to normal later. So, the temporal displacement at 1 month post-surgery was thought to be clinically meaningless. In conclusion, it was found that the positional changes in the lower eyelids in the blowout fracture surgery via transconjunctival approach were not significant.

The subciliary approach has been widely used for many years in lower eyelid surgery. The skin-muscle flap usually ends with the incision of the orbicularis oculi muscle in order to expose the orbital septum. This approach enables the easy exposure of anatomical structures and makes them more visible and accessible to the surgeon for the reconstruction of the fractured site. However, this results in the inevitable injury of the anterior lamella leading to cosmetic complications such as lid retraction and pretarsal flattening in some cases. Moreover, there are buccal branches of the facial nerve on the medial pretarsal orbicularis and these may be easily damaged when the orbicularis oculi muscle is cut medially. Therefore, technical expertise, conservation of the buccal nerve branches, and meticulous hemostasis are essential for the prevention of complications [1].

As an alternative to the subciliary approach, a transconjunctival approach was first introduced due to its advantages, such as a lower risk of eyelid malposition and minimal scarring [2]. According to the literatures, the transconjunctival incision was originally described by Bourget for the removal of lower eyelid fat in 1924 [3]. It was first advocated by Tessier for the exposure of the orbit and maxilla for the treatment of trauma and congenital disease in 1973. Now, transconjunctival incisions are widely used in lower eyelid surgery by many plastic surgeons.

The transconjunctival approach for repairing orbital fractures has been noted by several authors as having a lower risk of postoperative complications, such as lid retraction, ectropion, and hematoma formation. In reality, however, this approach can also result in entropion and trichiasis due to scar formation of the posterior lamella. Ridgway reported that the transconjunctival incision was most commonly associated with entropion among the approaches used to treat combined orbital floor or zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures. Furthermore, Novelli et al. [4] and Korchia et al. [5] noted that the transconjunctival approach may cause temporary entropion and trichiasis in rare cases, but does not result in permanent complications despite the incision of palpebral retractile tissues [4,5,6,7].

In spite of these concerns, many studies suggested that the transconjunctival approach was considerably safe and reliable. Zarem and Resnick [8] reported an extensive 10-year follow-up study, which demonstrated that transconjunctival lower blepharoplasty was a superior procedure in terms of the avoidance of retracted lower eyelids and dry eyes. He could not find any lower eyelid malposition among the 104 subjects. Baumann and Ewers [9] reported that preseptal transconjunctival incision without lateral canthotomy provides good exposure of the orbital floor and the caudal parts of the lateral and medial wall, and no complications were observed in the study. Moreover, Ho et al. [10] reported the absence of eyelid malposition, including retraction, ectropion, or a scleral show, and that no other complications, such as infection, hematoma formation, and implant protrusion, were noted in any of the 26 blowout fracture patients in the study.

There are some studies based on MRD₂ change between the preoperative and postoperative state of transconjunctival blepharoplasty. The mean lower eyelid position measured using MRD₂ increased by 0.05 mm after transconjunctival blepharoplasty. However, there was no significant difference in lower eyelid position after either technique (p>0.5) [11]. Segal et al. [12] reported that transconjunctival blepharoplasty did not induce lid retraction but rather elevated the lower eyelid in a majority of patients using MRD₂ measurement. Elevation of the lower eyelid can reduce or eliminate scleral show inferiorly, providing further cosmetic advantages.

In our study, we measured and quantified the positional changes of the lower eyelids in blowout fracture repairing via transconjunctival incision but there was no statistically significant difference between the time intervals. Moreover, there were no clinical complications, such as infection, hematoma, or bleeding. Based on these results, we suggest this approach as a safe and reliable method.

We believe that the reason for the lower rates of eyelid displacement by scar contracture on the posterior lamella is that mucosa has some advantages in terms of biological processes in wound healing. Many studies have shown that wound healing of the mucosa layer is distinct from other skin layers. Wong et al. [13] reported that scar formation was less facilitated in the oral mucosal layer than in the skin layer of humans and the Red Duroc pig. The study indicated that wound healing in the oral mucosa resulted in significantly reduced scar formation as compared with other skin layers. This was associated with the distinct molecular composition of the wound connective tissue in mucosa and other skin layers. Szpaderska et al. [14] also suggested that the higher speeds of wound healing exhibited by the mucosal layer compared to other skin layers was due to a reduced inflammatory response. The study found fewer inflammatory cells in oral mucosal wounds than other cutaneous wounds. It was supported by the measurement of decreased cytokine production in the oral mucosa. Diminished production of cytokines might be responsible for the reduced recruitment of neutrophils and macrophages. Hence, decreased intrinsic inflammatory response in mucosal wounds allowed for more rapid healing and less scar formation.

Furthermore, our findings can be explained by the microbiology and molecular activity of this type of tissue. Defensin is a small cysteine-rich cationic protein that consists of 18–45 amino acids and acts as antimicrobial peptides in the immune system as well as has a central role in wound healing and tissue remodeling [15]. Zhou et al. [16] found that human neutrophil defensing (HNP) maintained a high concentration on ocular surfaces until 3 days after ocular surgery. Furthermore, Li et al. [17] also reported that defensin contributed to the wound healing process via the modulation of conjunctival fibroblast. As a result, we can say that the high concentration of HNP on the ocular surface stimulates the proliferation and activation of conjunctival fibroblasts, which can promote conjunctival wound healing and less scarring.

There were some limitations to our study. First, the preoperative parameters were measured in non-traumatized lesions. This was inevitable because, in the presence of swelling or hematoma, the authors could not have discerned the normal lower eyelid position. Second, there were no data of a control group such as the transcutaneous approach. The author is currently collecting data of other approaches used in reconstructions to evaluate the reliability of the transconjunctival approach.

In conclusion, the advantages of the transconjunctival approach for the orbital access are minimal scarring and a lower risk of eyelid displacement compared with other methods. Additionally, other complications, such as infection, hematoma, and bleeding, are very rare. Based on our results, we recommend the transconjunctival approach for orbital exposure as a safe and reliable method.