INTRODUCTION
The most common clinical technique for ear reconstruction is surgical reconstruction with autologous tissue. This procedure requires the surgeon to have a high level of manual dexterity and artistic technique when carving and sculpting the harvested costal cartilage. The aesthetic outcomes of these surgical procedures are highly dependent on the experience of the surgeon [
1]. Some models for training have been developed using soaps and alloplastic materials [
2-
4]. Recently, ox scapular cartilage was introduced to simulate carving ear cartilage [
5]. In our previous study, swine scapular cartilage was obtained for a nasal septal cartilage model. The thickness was 3 to 6 mm, and the size varied depending on the animal’s weight [
6]. The aim of this study is to develop a two-stage training module using a radish and swine scapular cartilage for carving ear cartilage.
METHODS
Stage 1: White radish model
A white radish was cut in 3- to 6-mm-thick slices. The ear cartilage framework was carved using a graver. The helix and antihelix were fixed with pins (
Fig. 1).
Stage 2: Swine cartilage model
Swine scapular cartilage was obtained. The thickness varied from 3 to 6 mm (
Fig. 2A). The ear cartilage framework was made (
Fig. 2B). And triangular fossa and scaphoid fossa were carved with graver (
Fig. 2C). A curvilinear cartilage for helix (
Fig. 2D) was assembled to the framework by pin fixing (
Fig. 2E).
Participants
Six participants (three plastic surgery residents and three graduate students) were recruited for an ear reconstruction training workshop. Figures of the cartilage framework were provided [
7,
8].
Study outcomes
At the onset of the study, all participants were asked to complete a Likert-scale questionnaire. The pre-workshop questionnaire consisted of the item, “I have sufficient knowledge and skill for fabricating the ear cartilage framework” (
Supplemental Table S1). The post-workshop questionnaire consisted of the following items: “I learned useful knowledge from this workshop,” “I became somewhat confident in this skill after the workshop,” and “This workshop was helpful practically” (
Supplemental Table S2).
Participants were asked to rate their satisfaction with the outcome on a Likert scale (5: definitely yes, 4: yes, 3: moderate, 2: no, 1: definitely no).
RESULTS
On the pre-workshop questionnaire, participants indicated that they did not have sufficient knowledge and skill for fabricating the ear cartilage framework (1.5±0.5 using white radish; 1.3±0.5 using swine scapular cartilage).
On the post-workshop questionnaire, participants responded that they had learned useful knowledge from this workshop, reflecting a significant improvement (3.8±1.0 using white radish,
p=0.001; 4.0±1.1 using swine scapular cartilage,
p<0.001). They also indicated that they had become somewhat confident in this skill (4.2±0.8 using white radish,
p<0.001; 4.3±0.5 using swine scapular cartilage,
p<0.001 [independent two-samples t-test]) (
Table 1).
The participants generally found the workshop satisfactory (practically helpful, 4.7±0.5; knowledge improved, 4.8±0.4; satisfied with course, 4.5±0.5; would recommend to others, 4.8±0.4) (
Table 2).
DISCUSSION
Microtia reconstruction is a challenging procedure for trainees. The most complex part is learning how to fabricate a framework from costal cartilage. Some models have been developed for training using soaps, alloplastic materials, or ox scapular cartilage. Murabit et al. [
2] used silicone costal cartilage models. Thadani and Ladani [
3] wrote that a silicone dental impression material yielded a consistency and texture that were comparable to those of real costal cartilage. Erdogan et al. [
4] used a polyvinyl chloride plastic eraser since its texture was similar to that of human costal cartilage. Agrawal [
5] used ox scapular cartilage because its consistency, flexibility, and cutting experience almost matched that of human costal cartilage. Trainees also might use human rib cartilage from cadavers, however, fixed cadaveric cartilages are not easily available and too hard to carve because they are dehydrated and usually from old aged donors. In our previous study, swine scapular cartilage was obtained for a nasal septal cartilage model. The thickness was 3 to 6 mm, and the size varied depending on the animal’s weight [
6].
Our model can be simply made using easily obtained white radish and swine scapular cartilage, which are available at grocery stores and butcher shops, respectively. Using a burin and pins, trainees could feel the tactile sensation of carving a radish or cartilage. Radish model is easy to carve, so the trainees can express their creativity. However, radish does not have similar consistency with human rib cartilage. Swine scapular cartilage has similar consistency with human rib cartilage. After becoming skilled with radish model, swine scapular cartilage can also be carved easily for desired framework. Through a training workshop using our model, three residents and three graduate students who had never previously performed ear reconstruction obtained a full understanding of the procedures. They all became somewhat confident in their knowledge and skill after the workshop.
The present study is a study based on one department and has limited number of participants. Further study would be followed based on larger workshop for the trainee at congresses. With larger numbers of participants, better assessment tool other than pre- and post-workshop self-report could be applied. This model can be useful for ear reconstruction training for medical personnel.