The author previously reported an orbital wall restoring technique in which the orbital floor was restored to its prior position through the transnasal approach and temporary extraorbital support was maintained with a balloon in the maxillary sinus [
2-
6]. This procedure significantly decreased the extent of the orbital bone defect and increased bony continuity due to the anatomical restoration of the orbital wall and there is little risk of further volume change, since the primary orbital fragments healed in their original position. Furthermore, extraorbital ballooning temporarily provided counter-support to reduce the load applied on the implant [
2-
6].
Since the use of a balloon to provide support for the restored orbital floor was first reported by Johnson in 1944 [
12], many authors have introduced the techniques that allows simple and rapid restoration of the orbital floor. The Foley balloon catheter is a durable, flexible and adjustable implant that provides support to the restored orbital floor from the maxillary sinus, and it can be readily removed in the outpatient settings. We passed a curved Freer elevator through the maxillary ostium, it should be kept in mind, however, that a working knowledge of the complex anatomy of the nasal cavity is required to insert the instruments through the maxillary ostium successfully without causing inadvertent trauma to the surrounding structures [
2-
6]. Although the location of the maxillary ostium varies, any angled instrument can easily pass through the opening to enter the maxillary sinus from the nasal cavity. Nasopore is an absorbable packing sponge that provides sufficient support from the ethmoid sinus. It was absorbed several weeks later and we did not need to remove the packing, which decreased the risk of infection [
3].
The bone defect of the orbital wall became smaller as the fractured orbital wall was restored to its prior position, therefore, the use of resorbable implants in the author’s orbital wall restoring technique was expected to be reasonable. In addition, the temporary extraorbital support was expected to reduce the load applied on the orbital implants and to reduce the postoperative buckling and sagging of resorbable implants in orbital wall restoration surgery [
2-
4].
The ideal implant should be biocompatible, sterilizable, easy to manipulate, and capable of reproducing the original orbit shape [
4]. Currently, numerous alloplastic implants are produced and are commonly used to reconstruct orbital wall fractures. However, these non-resorbable permanent alloplastic implants (e.g., titanium or porous polyethylene) have late complications such as infection, foreign body reaction, displacement, and protrusion [
4]. Titanium mesh may lead to the adherence of orbital structures, resulting in postoperative extraocular movement restriction or eyelid retraction [
4]. Porous polyethylene remains as a foreign body, which may cause delayed-onset inflammation, despite its biocompatibility [
1]. In contrast, the resorbable mesh plates are largely free from these disadvantages. A resorbable mesh plate retains its mechanical strength for 1 to 2 years, allowing for adequate fibrous tissue formation in the bony orbital wall defect, after which it is completely degraded and absorbed, minimizing the risk of foreign body reaction [
4]. Therefore, this technique is useful for isolated floor or medial wall fractures with an intact bony buttress or a minimal fracture site [
4]. However, these implants can undergo sagging or buckling due to an untimely loss of mechanical strength in large fractures [
11], and they show a late enophthalmos rate of 5% to 16% [
12]. The use of absorbable implants is a safe way to reduce implant deformation and complications from residual permanent implants in orbital wall restoration surgery [
2-
6].
In conclusion, using this orbital wall restoration technique, the author was able to recreate a natural shape of the orbit with the patient’s own orbital bone fragment and effectively restored the orbital volume and shape. Fracture defect were reduced by restoring the primary orbital wall fragment making it possible to use relatively small size implant in blowout fracture surgery, furthermore, the extraorbital support provided by this technique reduced the incidence of implant displacement [
2-
6].